investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

IISD | 21-Mar-2017
Settlements raise threats to principles of good governance, including government accountability, respect for the rule of law, transparency, and respect for citizens’ rights and interests.
IISD | 21-Mar-2017
Les accords de règlement menacent les principes de bonne gouvernance, notamment la redevabilité des gouvernements, le respect de l’état de droit, la transparence et le respect des droits et intérêts des citoyens.
Politico | 20-Mar-2017
Canada has prevailed over pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly in a long-running investor-state dispute the drug company filed under NAFTA’s investment chapter.
IISD | 18-Mar-2017
The consultation was a missed opportunity for the Commission to obtain valuable inputs toward multilateral reform of investment dispute resolution in the best interest of Europeans and the international community.
Daily Business Review | 17-Mar-2017
Lawyers for Exxon Mobil have asked a federal judge to order Venezuela to pay the company more than $188.3 million—the amount Exxon Mobil says it is still owed as repayment for the 2007 expropriation of its oil assets.
Yicai Global | 17-Mar-2017
The Ansung case is the first international investment dispute to enter the arbitration stage where the Chinese government is a party.
Rebelión | 16-Mar-2017
Al llevar a cabo su actividad, Chevron/Texaco realizó una serie de operaciones, vinculadas a una reducción de costes en la explotación, que provocó derrames de crudo de enormes magnitudes, que causaron la destrucción de más de 450.000 hectáreas de bosque tropical amazónico y dejó 30.000 víctimas.
Alternatives Economiques | 15-Mar-2017
Le petit livre précis, informé et critique de la journaliste Haley Sweetland Edwards vient à point nommé pour expliquer les enjeux de la contestation contre les tribunaux d’arbitrage.
No al TTIP | 15-Mar-2017
Petición a la Comisión Europea y a los Ministros de Comercio Exterior de la UE.