NAFTA

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was comprised of Canada, Mexico and the United States. It came into effect in 1994 and was the first trade agreement among developed countries to include investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions.

Over 20 years later, Canada became the third most sued developed country in the world. Of the 77 known NAFTA investor-state disputes, 35 have been filed against Canada, 22 against Mexico and 20 against the US. American investors have won 11 of their cases and the US never lost a NAFTA investor dispute or paid any compensation to Canadian or Mexican companies.

Canada has paid American corporations more than US$200 million in the nine cases it has lost or settled. Besides, Canada has spent over US$65 million in legal fees, regardless of the cases’ outcome.

Most NAFTA arbitration disputes involved challenges to environmental protection or resources management that were claimed to have interfered with the profit of US corporations.

NAFTA was recently renegotiated and replaced by the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which was signed on 30 November 2018. The ISDS mechanism between the US and Canada, and between Mexico and Canada has been removed – even though it is included in the TPP, to which both countries belong. New procedures replace the ISDS between the US and Mexico. Expansive rights for investors are mostly terminated. Only limited claims are allowed after exhaustion of local remedies. But the ISDS mechanism has been maintained between the two countries for claims pertaining to Mexico’s oil and gas sector.

The most well-known cases include:

Ethyl (US) vs. Canada: case settled in 1998 for US$13 million paid to the US chemical company, in compensation for the ban of the toxic gasoline additive MMT. The ban was also lifted.

Metalclad (US) vs. Mexico: US$16.2 million awarded in 2000 to the investor, a waste management corporation, for not having been granted a construction permit for a toxic waste facility.

Loewen (Canada) vs. United States: the dispute over a funeral home contract was dismissed on far-fetched procedural grounds in 2003.

Photo: Obert Madondo / CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

(March 2020)

CCPA | 29-Jun-2023
This briefing paper explores what that prioritization might look like, and proposes a number of concrete paths forward for the Canadian government.
La Presse | 29-Jun-2023
Un nouveau rapport publié mercredi par le Centre canadien de politiques alternatives recommande à Ottawa de soutenir la défense américaine : que TC Énergie n’a aucun recours légal en vertu des règles commerciales nord-américaines, passées ou présentes.
The Globe and Mail | 28-Jun-2023
Enerflex argued the ruling defied regional trade agreements between Mexico, the United States and Canada, also calling the court’s decision “indirect expropriation” and denouncing arbitrary treatment by the Mexican state.
The Conversation | 23-May-2023
US$20 billion: That’s how much American investors think Canadian taxpayers should fork over to compensate them for their failed bid to develop a liquefied natural gas facility in Québec.
CIAR Global | 18-May-2023
El inversor estadounidense Access Business Group LLC, compañía de servicios de fabricación por encargo, ha presentado un arbitraje de inversiones contra México en el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones después de enviar la notificación de intención de demanda el 11 de octubre de 2022.
CIAR Global | 14-May-2023
El arbitraje de inversiones entre el administrador de fondos estadounidenses agrícolas Amerra y JPMorgan contra México es una realidad, después de más de dos años de presentada la notificación de intención de someter la reclamación al arbitraje del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN).
La Jornada | 9-May-2023
La reciente aprobación por el Congreso mexicano de la reforma a la ley minera, por diluida que sea según críticos, debería acompañarse de una profunda revisión y modificación de tratados de libre comercio y de inversión que otorgan a empresas mineras gran cancha para seguir demandando al país
El Libertador | 5-May-2023
Un grupo de 33 congresistas estadounidenses, ha solicitado al secretario de Estado de EE.UU., Antony Blinken y la representante de Comercio, Katherin Tai, que se apoye la defensa de Honduras ante la abusiva demanda interpuesta por la ilegal ZEDE Próspera, propiedad de Erick A. Brimen, que busca cobrar a los hondureños 11,000 millones de dólares.
Reuters | 4-May-2023
Democratic U.S. lawmakers on Wednesday urged the U.S. Trade Representative and State Department to eliminate investor-state dispute settlement provisions from current and future trade deals
CIAR Global | 26-Apr-2023
El 2 de marzo de 2023, Silver Bull anunció que había presentado ante México una Notificación de Intención de arbitraje invocando el Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) para recuperar los daños financieros provocados por el bloqueo ilegal del proyecto Sierra Mojada.