Europe

European Union (EU) member states have signed over 1300 investment treaties with third countries, in addition to some 200 between EU members. Non-EU European states are party to over 500 treaties. Most of these contain investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions, which enable foreign corporations to take ISDS claims against states if they deem their profits or potential investment to be affected by new laws or changes in policy.

The EU has ratified four agreements with an ISDS mechanism: the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), to which 53 European and Central Asian countries are party, the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada, and agreements with Vietnam and Singapore. Only the ECT has been fully in force. The ISDS provisions in the three others will be implemented after all member states have ratified them.

These three deals also include a revised ISDS mechanism created by the European Commission, known as the investment court system. Many critics say that this new system is largely window-dressing and does not address the core of the problem behind investor-state dispute measures.

In 2015, the European Commission asked the EU member states to terminate their intra-EU bilateral investment treaties (BITs), arguing they are incompatible with EU law, which was confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its “Achmea” decision.

As of April 2020, the number of intra-EU ISDS disputes amounted to 170, approximately 17% of all cases globally, 76 of which having been brought under the ECT.

Overall investors from European countries have initiated over 600 ISDS cases, half of which are against non-European states. European countries have been targeted in about 350 cases. Grouped together, investors from EU member states have launched the majority of total disputes (over 400).

Spain, the Czech Republic, Poland, Russia and Ukraine have been among the ten most frequent respondent states, while the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, France, Luxembourg, Italy and Switzerland have been among the ten most frequent home states of the investor.

The most well-known cases include:

Yukos (Isle of Man) vs. Russia: US$50 billion awarded in 2014 to majority shareholders of the oil and gas company (ECT invoked).

Eureko (Netherland) vs. Poland: case settled in 2005 for about €2 billion in favour of the investor, a large European insurance company (Netherland-Poland BIT invoked).

Ceskoslovenska Obchodni Banka (Czech Republic) vs. Slovak Republic: €553 million awarded in 2004 to the investor, one of the largest commercial banks in the Czech Republic (Czech Republic-Slovak Republic BIT invoked).

Photo: War on Want

(April 2020)

Zone Bourse | 5-Feb-2019
Le CIRDI a décidé que la Hongrie devrait verser une indemnité de 73 millions d’euros hors intérêts à Sodexo.
Globe Newswire | 5-Feb-2019
Hungarian State has been ordered to pay Sodexo an award of about 73 million euro, before interest.
CIAR Global | 1-Feb-2019
El tribunal del arbitraje Anglo American PLC contra Venezuela emitió un laudo dando la razón a la República Bolivariana.
Foley Hoag | 30-Jan-2019
Anglo American loses $400 million claim against Venezuela over an expropriated ferronickel processing facility.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 29-Jan-2019
It would be a brave person who would gamble on the CJEU not extending its Achmea reasoning to the ECT. Perhaps the time for obituaries is not yet nigh, but the headstone is already being carved.
Reuters | 29-Jan-2019
The EU-Canada free trade deal’s provisions on investor protection are in line with EU law, a senior court adviser said in a recommendation to the European Court of Justice.
L’Echo | 29-Jan-2019
Le traité commercial avec le Canada est compatible avec le droit de l’Union, estime l’avocat général de la Cour de Justice de l’UE.
Open Democracy | 24-Jan-2019
Campaigners dressed as wolves in suits invaded the streets of Davos to highlight the real face of private-sector influence.
La Vie Eco | 24-Jan-2019
La multinationale allemande estime que le gouvernement marocain a entravé son investissement dans une unité de recyclage des déchets ferreux, en fermant abusivement les frontières à ses exportations de ferraille E40 à partir de l’année 2013.
Belarus Digest | 22-Jan-2019
In late 2017 and 2018, Belarus faced a record-breaking three investment arbitration claims.