CAFTA

The US-Dominican Republic–Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR or CAFTA for short) was signed in 2004. It encompasses the United States and the Central American countries of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and the Dominican Republic.

The investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism specified in CAFTA has provided US companies privileged means to challenge national laws and claim millions of US dollars in compensation in Central America.

As of end of 2019, CAFTA was invoked in 11 cases.

The most well-known cases include:

TCW (US) vs. The Dominican Republic: case settled in 2009 for US$26.5 million to the investor, an investment management corporation.

Railroad Development Corporation (US) vs. Guatemala: US$18.6 million awarded in 2012 to the investor in a dispute over a railroad contract.

Pac Rim Cayman LLC (US) vs. El Salvador: In 2008, El Salvador denied a mining permit to Pac Rim (now OceanaGold) due to environmental concerns, and notably the impact on water resources. In 2012, the arbitral tribunal dismissed jurisdiction over the CAFTA claims but assumed jurisdiction of the claims under the domestic investment law. In October 2016, the tribunal decided that the company’s case was without merit.

Photo: Danny Hammontree / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

(March 2020)

LPE Project | 15-Dec-2023
The stakes for Honduras are not simply the billions of dollars otherwise destined for health, housing, and education. They are the very existence of Crawfish Rock: the past and future of the families who have inhabited the island for centuries.
Project Syndicate | 1-Dec-2023
The ongoing lawsuit brought against Honduras by an American company underscores the unjust and undemocratic nature of the investor-state dispute settlement system.
Tribune | 24-Nov-2023
American billionaires are suing the Honduran government for blocking the creation of a libertarian city-state in the country. If they win, it will be a devastating victory for corporate colonialism over democracy.
CIAR Global | 19-Sep-2023
Los arbitrajes de inversiones contra Honduras siguen saltando a la actualidad del sector en el ámbito internacional.
Contra Corriente | 18-Aug-2023
Honduras enfrenta seis demandas de arbitrajes internacionales ante el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (CIADI), un tribunal del Banco Mundial basado en Washington.
Preceso Digital | 24-Jul-2023
Honduras amenaza con retirarse del centro de arbitraje de disputas de inversiones con sede en Washington, Estados Unidos en protesta por el reclamo que hizo la sede Prospera por 11 mil millones de dólares.
Bretton Woods Project | 20-Jul-2023
Honduras is threatening to withdraw from the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes over an $11 billion claim by Honduras Prospera, a US company.
América Latina Mejor sin TLC | 30-Jun-2023
Organizaciones de todo el mundo convocan a adherir a una declaración en solidaridad con el país centroamericano. Denuncian que una transnacional norteamericana demandó al país por tomar la decisión soberana de recuperar el control de su territorio. La demanda alcanza los 11 mil millones de dólares, dos tercios del presupuesto nacional.
Public Citizen | 30-Jun-2023
We stand in solidarity with the people of Honduras and condemn US company Próspera’s $11 billion case against the will of the people.
La Tribuna | 13-Jun-2023
Honduras rechaza al árbitro aceptado por el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias Relativas a Inversiones (Ciadi) en el litigio “ilegal” de la ZEDE Próspera, luego de enviar ayer una notificación oficial a este organismo asentado en Washington, Estados Unidos.