investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Ministry of External Affairs, Goverrnment of India | 3-Jan-2019
MENAFN | 2-Jan-2019
The EU has proposed to reform the investor-state-dispute-settlement system, a move that could further complicate negotiations with China over a bilateral investment agreement, as well as their dialogue on the Belt and Road Initiative’s implementation in Europe.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 2-Jan-2019
Since 2017, the country has shown a hostile attitude towards international arbitration.
Les Echos | 2-Jan-2019
La Commission européenne souhaite imposer une nouvelle configuration aux mécanismes de résolution des litiges en matière d’investissement.
Argentina Mejor Sin TLC | 28-Dec-2018
El Tratado mantiene amplios derechos para los inversores, incluidos algunos de los que usan con más frecuencia para demandar a los Estados: Trato Justo y Equitativo, la Expropiación Indirecta, el Trato Nacional y el Trato de Nación Más Favorecida.
Cinco Días | 27-Dec-2018
El Ciadi, la corte de arbitraje internacional que depende del Banco Mundial, ha resuelto que el Estado argentino debe abonar una indemnización de 225,69 millones de dólares (unos 200 millones de euros) más intereses por la resolución anticipada de los contratos de gestión de aguas en la ciudad de Santa Fe.
South Centre | 21-Dec-2018
Can an intellectual property right or a license authorizing its use be deemed an ‘investment’ under bilateral investment treaties?
Reuters | 21-Dec-2018
Investment funds backing a slew of big-dollar corporate lawsuits has boomed over the past decade, fueled by favorable court rulings and investors seeking juicy returns.
CIAR Global | 20-Dec-2018
El portal Jus Mundi ha publicado el laudo final del arbitraje entre Foresight Luxembourg Solar 1 SARL y España, que dio la razón a los inversores y que hace apenas unas semanas era noticia por el comunicado de la compañía danesa Athena Investments, antes Greentech, sobre su porción del laudo.
El Tiempo | 20-Dec-2018
Defensa del Estado dijo que pleito se resolverá en tribunal. Empresa dice que fueron ’expropiados’.