investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Desmog | 14-Jan-2017
EU lawmakers voted for the European Parliament to push ahead with a trade deal that could encourage Canadian tar sand oil imports and make it easier for energy companies to sue governments when environmental policies threaten their profits.
Lexology | 13-Jan-2017
The Singapore International Arbitration Centre launched its Investment Arbitration Rules 2017, potentially marking a new chapter in the institutional administration of investor-State arbitration proceedings.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 13-Jan-2017
Bosnia and Herzegovina (“BiH”) is generally perceived as a good emerging market for investment.
El País | 12-Jan-2017
Empresas y gobiernos protagonizan conflictos entre los intereses económicos y los derechos humanos.
Third World Resurgence | 12-Jan-2017
In highlighting that the drafts of many of its key chapters are substantially similar to those of the TPP, Sanya Reid Smith warns that the RCEP may end up as a replica of the former.
Miroir Social | 12-Jan-2017
Si la Cour de justice de l’Union Européenne (UE) suit les conclusions de son avocate générale, les accords de libre-échange pourraient bien devoir être ratifiés par les Parlements de tous les États membres.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 11-Jan-2017
Central to the general public’s opposition to ISDS is the concept of legitimate expectations.
TASS | 11-Jan-2017
Yukos former shareholders are trying to dispute the decision of the Hague District Court.
CIAR Global | 9-Jan-2017
El pasado 29 de diciembre, el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (Ciadi) publicó el laudo consensuado fruto del Acuerdo de Conciliación del arbitraje entre la República Argentina y los bonistas italianos Abaclat y Otros, representados por Task Force Argentina (TFA).
CIAR Global | 9-Jan-2017
El 19 de diciembre de 2016, el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones, Ciadi, hizo pública la decisión sobre la solicitud de anulación de Argentina en relación con el arbitraje que mantiene con la francesa SAUR International.