Europe

European Union (EU) member states have signed over 1300 investment treaties with third countries, in addition to some 200 between EU members. Non-EU European states are party to over 500 treaties. Most of these contain investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions, which enable foreign corporations to take ISDS claims against states if they deem their profits or potential investment to be affected by new laws or changes in policy.

The EU has ratified four agreements with an ISDS mechanism: the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), to which 53 European and Central Asian countries are party, the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada, and agreements with Vietnam and Singapore. Only the ECT has been fully in force. The ISDS provisions in the three others will be implemented after all member states have ratified them.

These three deals also include a revised ISDS mechanism created by the European Commission, known as the investment court system. Many critics say that this new system is largely window-dressing and does not address the core of the problem behind investor-state dispute measures.

In 2015, the European Commission asked the EU member states to terminate their intra-EU bilateral investment treaties (BITs), arguing they are incompatible with EU law, which was confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its “Achmea” decision.

As of April 2020, the number of intra-EU ISDS disputes amounted to 170, approximately 17% of all cases globally, 76 of which having been brought under the ECT.

Overall investors from European countries have initiated over 600 ISDS cases, half of which are against non-European states. European countries have been targeted in about 350 cases. Grouped together, investors from EU member states have launched the majority of total disputes (over 400).

Spain, the Czech Republic, Poland, Russia and Ukraine have been among the ten most frequent respondent states, while the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, France, Luxembourg, Italy and Switzerland have been among the ten most frequent home states of the investor.

The most well-known cases include:

Yukos (Isle of Man) vs. Russia: US$50 billion awarded in 2014 to majority shareholders of the oil and gas company (ECT invoked).

Eureko (Netherland) vs. Poland: case settled in 2005 for about €2 billion in favour of the investor, a large European insurance company (Netherland-Poland BIT invoked).

Ceskoslovenska Obchodni Banka (Czech Republic) vs. Slovak Republic: €553 million awarded in 2004 to the investor, one of the largest commercial banks in the Czech Republic (Czech Republic-Slovak Republic BIT invoked).

Photo: War on Want

(April 2020)

Nikkei Asia | 16-Jan-2024
Investors in Hong Kong are preparing to file a request for arbitration against the Swiss government for writing off the AT1 bonds issued by Credit Suisse, claiming the move was at odds with a bilateral investment treaty between the jurisdictions.
IISD | 15-Jan-2024
Le tribunal a accordé au demandeur 207,8 millions USD de dommages, ainsi que des intérêts et le remboursement des frais d’arbitrage.
IISD | 15-Jan-2024
In September 2023, the European Commission has unveiled a non-paper presenting model clauses for BITs between EU member states and third countries.
IISD | 15-Jan-2024
En septembre 2023, la Commission européenne a dévoilé un document officieux présentant des clauses types pour les traités bilatéraux d’investissement entre les États membres de l’UE et les pays tiers.
IISD | 15-Jan-2024
RWE a choisi de se désister de l’affaire auprès du CIRDI, avec l’accord des Pays-Bas.
IISD | 15-Jan-2024
L’UE apparaît en tant que défendeur dans l’un des trois arbitrages introduits par des sociétés de raffinage de pétrole appartenant au groupe Klesch.
Essex Court Chambers | 12-Jan-2024
Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star argued that Norway had violated the BIT between Latvia and Norway in relation to alleged investments of the claimants in snow crab harvesting licenses and harvesting vessels.
L’Observatoire de l’Europe | 12-Jan-2024
La décision de se retirer ou non du traité reste dans les limbes, certains pays de l’UE souhaitant rester et d’autres l’ayant déjà quitté.
Euronews | 11-Jan-2024
Decision on whether to part from treaty remains in limbo, with some EU countries wanting to stay and others having already departed.
ABH Holdings S.A. | 5-Jan-2024
ABHH seeks full compensation for the expropriation of Sense Bank by the Ukrainian authorities through enforced nationalisation.