Pacific

Pacific states have signed about 65 trade and investment agreements, 40 of which have been concluded by Australia alone.

Most of Australia’s trade deals specify investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions, including those with China (ChAFTA, in the final stage of being ratified), India, Korea, Mexico or Turkey.

Following a dispute with Philip Morris over an anti-tobacco law, Australia claimed it would refrain from engaging into new investment agreements with ISDS.

However Australia has signed ChAFTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) whose investment chapter has revealed the inclusion of an ISDS mechanism that would undermine public health, the environment and other public-interest ‘safeguards’.

The Philip Morris vs. Australia case is the most well-known dispute to date. When Australia voted an anti-tobacco law forcing tobacco companies to use plain packaging, US company Philip Morris initiated an ISDS dispute through its Hong Kong-based subsidiary. It invoked the Australia-Hong Kong bilateral investment treaty (BIT) due to the non-inclusion of ISDS provisions in the Australia-US BIT. The case has been eventually dismissed on procedural grounds. More than US$35 million of taxpayer money was reported to have gone up in smoke in legal fees only.

The Pacific has been the least targeted region. Only Australian investors have initiated disputes on two registered occasions.

(January 2016)

The News | 23-Mar-2017
The ICSID tribunal rejected Pakistan’s final defence against liability, and confirmed that Pakistan had violated several provisions of its bilateral investment treaty with Australia.
Stock Market Wire | 22-Mar-2017
The ICSID tribunal rejected Pakistan’s final defence against liability and confirmed that Pakistan had violated several provisions of its bilateral investment treaty with Australia
The Australian | 2-Mar-2017
Taxpayers are still in the dark about how much of their money has been spent on fighting tobacco giant Philip Morris over plain packaging laws.
Tele Sur | 23-Feb-2017
Over 280 organizations from around the world sent an open letter to Canadian-Australian mining giant OceanaGold demanding that the company adhere to an earlier ruling that ordered the company to pay the government of El Salvador US$8 million
The Conversation | 20-Feb-2017
While consultancies, political donations, secondments and staff movements magnify corporate influence over government, an equally sinister trend is playing out in the world of multinational corporations.
El Salvador | 3-Feb-2017
Vocera de la firma, Ericka Colindres, dijo que se basarán en la ley vigente.
El Mundo | 31-Jan-2017
La empresa OceanaGold aún no paga la compensación de $8 millones, como lo ordena el fallo del CIADI.
ABC | 6-Dec-2016
The problem with free trade deals is they rarely are about trade. In fact, trade usually is a side issue. And the TPP was a classic case in point.
Alter Infos | 4-Nov-2016
Au terme de sept ans d’un processus d’arbitrage lancé par Oceana Gold le différend a été tranché en faveur de l’État salvadorien.
The Guardian | 25-Oct-2016
Threat of action from multinationals one of the ‘enormous risks’ Australia faces if trade deal is ratified, GetUp says

0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90