Services

Utility corporations have used investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions found in trade and investment agreements to challenge state attempts to regulate privatized public services such as water, social security or other services.

In response to several governments which have tried to lower public services rates for poorer populations or in face of a significant economic crisis, foreign companies have initiated ISDS disputes, claiming they were treated “unfairly”, due to their loss of profits.

Potentially, any significant reforms of standards in relation to major infrastructure or utilities and associated services could be the target of ISDS.

As of end of 2019, about 2/3 of all ISDS disputes concerned the services sector at large, including public services but also financial services, telecommunications, transport, construction, etc.

Most well-known disputes include:

• Azurix (US) v. Argentina: US$165 million awarded in 2006 to the investor, a water company. The dispute arose from the contamination of a reservoir, which made the water undrinkable in the area. The firm claimed the government had expropriated its investment and denied the firm “fair and equitable treatment” by not allowing rate increases and not investing sufficient public funds in the water infrastructure (Argentina-US BIT invoked).

• Tampa Electric Company “TECO” (US) vs. Guatemala: the US-based energy company challenged Guatemala’s decision to lower the electricity rates that a private utility could charge. TECO was awarded US$25 million in 2013 (CAFTA invoked).

• TCW (US) vs. Dominican Republic: the US investment management corporation that jointly owned with the government one of the Dominican Republic’s three electricity distribution firms, sued the government for failing to raise electricity rates and to prevent electricity theft by poor residents. Case settled in 2009 for US$26.5 million paid to the investor (CAFTA invoked).

Photo: Aqua Mechanical / CC BY 2.0

(March 2020)

Aero Naves | 21-Jan-2021
Tras la negativa del Ministerio de Obras Públicas a indemnizar a ADP y Vinci por las pérdidas causadas por la pandemia del COVID-19, las dos empresas francesas iniciaron una demanda contra Chile ante el CIADI.
BusinessLine | 18-Jan-2021
The petition, filed by three investment firms related to Devas, argues that the award can be enforced in the US because India is a signatory to the New York Convention.
La Tercera | 12-Jan-2021
CIADI rechaza demandad de hermanos Francisco y Carlos Ríos en contra del Estado de Chile por falencias del Transantiago.
South China Morning Post | 11-Jan-2021
Draft text shows Beijing looked to withhold telecoms sector benefits to firms from countries with restrictions on Chinese telecoms companies.
Médias24 | 11-Dec-2020
Les parties s’accordent sur la suspension de la procédure. Des sources évoquent des discussions sur un possible accord amiable.
Technology’s Legal Edge | 18-Nov-2020
There is evidence that high levels of activity in the telecommunications sector are leading to an associated increase in telecoms-related disputes.
Business Today | 27-Oct-2020
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta has advised the government that the decision of an arbitration tribunal cannot contradict the law passed by a sovereign parliament.
Bar and Bench | 26-Oct-2020
The scope of consent to arbitration is an important issue that needs to be finally settled - not least because it could have multi-billion dollar implications for India in respect of other cases involving challenges to India’s taxation measures by foreign investors.
La Lettre A | 24-Oct-2020
Près de dix ans après le début du conflit libyen, une créance d’un milliard d’euros fait toujours l’objet d’âpres batailles juridiques entre Paris, Tripoli et Koweït city.
BFM | 15-Oct-2020
L’opérateur télécoms français Orange a lancé une procédure judiciaire contre l’Etat irakien pour "expropriation" en mars 2019 de son investissement dans l’opérateur Korek Telecom, estimé à plus de 400 millions de dollars.