investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Korea Times | 24-Jun-2020
The government is apparently baffled by Lone Star Fund’s attempts to use Korean news outlets as a means of putting itself in a dominant position in its $4.68 billion legal battle against Seoul.
TNI | 23-Jun-2020
Cómo los abogados se preparan para demandar a los Estados por las medidas tomadas en respuesta al COVID 19.
RT | 23-Jun-2020
The Supreme Court of the Netherlands has agreed to consider Russia’s appeal against a lower court ruling, which awarded multi-billion-dollar compensation to former shareholders of the defunct Russian oil giant, Yukos.
Collectif Stop Tafta | 23-Jun-2020
Des bureaux d’avocats démarchent des investisseurs privés pour les encourager à poursuivre les pouvoirs publics devant une justice parallèle afin de réclamer des dizaines ou des centaines de millions d’euros d’indemnités.
IIED | 22-Jun-2020
International investment law and investor dispute arbitration too often fail to notice the concerns of local actors. Governance of these international mechanisms needs to take a more holistic, development-based view of the issues.
Proceso | 19-Jun-2020
“Si tras un estallido social ocurren saqueos de comercios, los inversores podrían alegar que el Estado ha incumplido su obligación de brindarles plena protección y seguridad”.
Chile Mejor sin TLC | 19-Jun-2020
Quieren transformarse en víctimas y denunciar al Estado de Chile para no asumir los costos y que se les compense por supuestas pérdidas económicas, esto es posible por los TLCs y acuerdos de protección de inversiones que Chile ha suscrito
Observatoire des multinationales | 19-Jun-2020
Confronté à la perte d’un contrat dans la ville d’Osorno au Chili, le groupe Suez brandit la menace d’un recours aux tribunaux arbitraux.
The Corner | 18-Jun-2020
The ICSID has lifted the suspension on the execution of the €290 million award NextEra obtained a year ago.
CIAR Global | 16-Jun-2020
Suez amenaza con llevar el conflicto que mantiene con el gobierno chileno, a raíz de la apertura de un procedimiento para finalizar el contrato de concesión de su subsidiaria ESSAL en Osorno en agosto de 2019, a arbitraje de inversiones ante el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (CIADI).