investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

CCFD-Terre Solidaire | 9-Jan-2020
Des communautés ont combattu des mines d’or toxiques, des forages pétroliers et des projets immobiliers de luxe. Aujourd’hui, de coûteuses poursuites en justice en vertu du règlement de différends entre investisseurs et États (ISDS) risquent d’annuler leurs victoires.
CEO | 9-Jan-2020
Inspiring people fought toxic gold mines, dirty oil drilling and greedy luxury real estate projects. Now, costly investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) lawsuits risk to reverse their community victories.
LesEco | 9-Jan-2020
Le géant américain estime qu’une récente démarche du Maroc a pour but de retarder le dénouement de l’affaire de la liquidation de la raffinerie.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 8-Jan-2020
This termination agreement marks the culmination of the European Commission’s and several Member States’ efforts to abolish intra-EU investment arbitration proceedings from the European legal order.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 8-Jan-2020
The leaked treaty for the termination of intra-EU BITs can be seen as the culmination of an ongoing effort by the EU Commission to discourage investment arbitration between Member States, reflecting a tension between public international law and EU law.
Developing Telecoms | 8-Jan-2020
The ICSID has issued an interim order preventing Nepal’s government from collecting capital gains tax on Axiata’s acquisition of Ncell.
CIAR Global | 7-Jan-2020
La constructora peruana Graña y Montero ha comunicado el desistimiento del arbitraje presentado ante el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias Relativas a Inversiones, CIADI, tras haber llegado a un acuerdo con el gobierno peruano
Biopharmapress | 7-Jan-2020
Proper mandatory licenses will be exempt from claims for expropriation under the China BIT model.
Ciar Global | 3-Jan-2020
La constructora Graña y Montero S.A.A. ha presentado una solicitud de arbitraje ante el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias Relativas a Inversiones, CIADI, tras haber agotado la vía de trato directo, contra Perú.