investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

No al TTIP | 2-Mar-2018
Inversores de Novenergia logran un laudo condenatorio en Estocolmo. El demandadente reclamaba 60 millones y otros 1.900 millones en otro arbitraje.
CNCD 11.11.11 | 2-Mar-2018
Les nouvelles balises adoptées ce mercredi au Parlement wallon concernant les accords commerciaux seront-elles déjà piétinées dès ce vendredi ?
Energy Voice | 1-Mar-2018
The tribunal found that Novenergia’s investments were achieving a reasonable rate of return. However, the tribunal held that it was sufficient for the claim to succeed that Novenergia could show “quantifiable prejudice” compared with its position when it initially made its investment.
Lexology | 1-Mar-2018
On 26 December 2017, the Commission published its decision that attacked the ECT claims brought by investors against Spain (and other EU states).
Mondaq | 1-Mar-2018
One tribunal could interpret the effect of legislative provisions differently to another. So while Eiser opens up the prospect of more claims, Blusun may narrow the basis for claims.
Clyde & Co | 1-Mar-2018
With the global financial crisis, solar power incentives schemes became unbearably costly and Spain repealed those incentives. Consequently, many investors brought arbitration claims under the Energy Charter Treaty.
El Salto | 28-Feb-2018
¿Aprobaría usted que la Unión Europea firme un acuerdo comercial con el régimen de Duterte en Filipinas o con el Gobierno ilegítimo de Temer en Brasil a pesar de graves violaciones de derechos humanos? Nadie le va a hacer esa pregunta, sin embargo, la Comisión Europea trabaja en esos y en otra decena de tratados, muchos de los cuales pueden cerrarse sin siquiera pasar por los Parlamentos nacionales.
112 | 28-Feb-2018
The lawsuit requirements come down to the amount of compensation, which has been evaluated by independent experts at over $5 billion.
No al TTIP | 27-Feb-2018
Los países de la UE planean solicitar a la Comisión Europea que no divida automáticamente la parte de la protección de la inversión de los acuerdos comerciales, sino que aplique la nueva arquitectura para los acuerdos comerciales de la UE “caso por caso, dependiendo del socio de negociación” según el borrador de Conclusiones del Consejo Informal de Ministros de Comercio de la UE
EconoMex | 26-Feb-2018
El pasado 24 de enero, 11 países de la Cuenca del Pacífico alcanzaron un acuerdo para firmar un resucitado Tratado Transpacífico (TPP), pero ahora con el nombre de Acuerdo Global y Progresivo para la Asociación Transpacífico (CPTPP por sus siglas en inglés).