investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Interfax | 13-Mar-2017
Russia must bear responsibility for protecting Ukrainian investors in Crimea after its annexation under the Russian-Ukrainian bilateral investment treaty.
Romandie | 13-Mar-2017
La condamnation du Venezuela à verser 1,4 milliard de dollars à ExxonMobil pour la nationalisation d’un champ pétrolier sous le mandat d’Hugo Chavez a été annulée par une juridiction d’arbitrage internationale.
International Economic Law and Policy Blog | 13-Mar-2017
An ICSID Annulment Committee’s decision to reduce the damages to be paid to Exxon by $1.4 billion seems like a cause for celebration-a victory of economic sovereignty over Big Oil. But as gifts to economic justice go, this one is a Trojan horse indeed.
IELP Blog | 12-Mar-2017
A dissent sends the message: beware, if one other arbitrator had gone the way that Born did, we would have won.
No al TTIP | 11-Mar-2017
Este webinar presentará la propuesta de la Comisión Europea así como varias perspectivas críticas sobre el tema.
CentralAmerica | 11-Mar-2017
El Tribunal Arbitral del CIADI resolvió que el gobierno costarricense no causó daño a la empresa de capital suizo Gas Nacional Zeta, que pretendía una indemnización de $75 millones por los desacuerdos en la fijación de tarifas de gas LP.
TeleSUR | 10-Mar-2017
El Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias Relativas a Inversiones (Ciadi) reconoció el apego legal de las autoridades venezolanas sobre la participación de Exxon en el proyecto Cerro Negro.
The Hindu | 10-Mar-2017
The tax dispute between the Indian government and Cairn Plc has been the subject of international arbitration from 2014.
Q Costa Rica | 10-Mar-2017
The ICSID Arbitral Tribunal has ruled that the Costa Rican government did not cause damage to the company of Swiss capital, Gas Nacional Zeta.
Reuters | 10-Mar-2017
A World Bank tribunal’s order for Venezuela to pay $1.4 billion in damages to Exxon Mobil Corp over nationalizations has been annulled