investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Les Echos | 25-May-2021
Sodexo a annoncé la confirmation par le CIRDI de la décision arbitrale qui avait été rendue en sa faveur en janvier 2019.
Médias24 | 25-May-2021
Suite à une transaction, désistement des deux parties dans leur arbitrage au CIRDI. Le Maroc risquait une condamnation à 50 millions d’euros.
| 22-May-2021
Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions in free trade and investment agreements protect mining projects that often wreak environmental havoc, creating sacrificial zones where entire ecosystems collapse and communities suffer the most. Most ISDS disputes have involved environmental issues. Barrick Gold vs. Papua New Guinea Churchill Mining vs. Indonesia Copper Mesa vs. Ecuador Crystallex vs. Venezuela Eco Oro vs. Colombia Foresti vs. South Africa Gabriel Resources vs. Romania (...)
Le Soir d’Algérie | 21-May-2021
Un groupe cimentier égyptien réclame à l’Algérie le versement de 900 millions de dollars et menace de le mener à l’arbitrage international.
Infobae | 20-May-2021
México enfrenta 13 disputas de arbitraje ante el CIADI, 10 de las cuales han sido introducidas desde 2018.