investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Expreso | 8-Apr-2019
César Gutiérrez advierte que con el DU 001 - 2017 también se favorecerá a Odebrecht y a Graña y Montero
Bolsamanía | 8-Apr-2019
Martín Vizcarra, presidente de Perú, se ha comprometido a buscar una solución al conflicto del país con Enagás por el Gasoducto Sur Peruano (GSP)
TNI | 8-Apr-2019
ISDS lawyers appear to hold administrative positions within the working group and are represented in large numbers in the advisory bodies that have been established for the working group.
AFTINET | 8-Apr-2019
Advocates of ISDS (industrialised countries and lawyers from the ‘arbitration industry’) dominate the running of the Working Group and its advisory bodies. Civil society is underrepresented.
Stop Corporate Power | 5-Apr-2019
The Global Campaign to Reclaim Peoples´ Sovereignty, Dismantle Corporate Power and End Impunity regrets the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the case of Chevron in the Ecuadorian Amazon.
Stop Corporate Power | 5-Apr-2019
The Global Campaign to Reclaim Peoples´ Sovereignty, Dismantle Corporate Power and End Impunity regrets the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the case of Chevron in the Ecuadorian Amazon.
The American Prospect | 5-Apr-2019
USMCA bears many resemblances to NAFTA, which has been cited as a driver of low-wage corporate outsourcing.
Gatra.com | 5-Apr-2019
Indonesia for Global Justice (IGJ) menyambut baik kemenangan Indonesia atas IMFA. Namun, IGJ meminta agar Pemerintah Indonesia tidak lengah atas kemenangan tersebut.
No al TTIP | 4-Apr-2019
La Campaña Global para reivindicar la Soberanía de los Pueblos, desmantelar el poder corporativo y poner fin a la impunidad, lamenta el fallo de la Corte Suprema de Canadá sobre el caso Chevron en la Amazonía ecuatoriana y reitera la urgente necesidad de establecer un Tratado Vinculante de las Naciones Unidas sobre empresas transnacionales y los derechos humanos.
EJIL: Talk! | 4-Apr-2019
The principle that adjudicators must be independent and impartial is at the core of any adjudicatory mechanism. It plays an important role in Investor-State arbitration, where arbitrators typically sit for a short amount of time and are not career judges.