investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Observer | 26-Jan-2017
The TransCanada lawsuit became virtually meaningless as Trump signed an executive order to continue construction of the Keystone XL
Prensa Latina | 26-Jan-2017
Fallo favorable en el caso interpuesto por la empresa española Supervisión y Control S.A.
Sputnik | 26-Jan-2017
The Hague Court of Appeal has rejected a plea to bifurcate hearings on a complaint by the former shareholders of Russia’s now-defunct Yukos oil firm
Reuters | 24-Jan-2017
La aerolínea de bandera Air Canada informó el lunes que solicitó al Banco Mundial un arbitraje para que le sean liberados sus ingresos por ventas de boletos en Venezuela
Lexology | 24-Jan-2017
In Renco v Peru, an UNCITRAL tribunal decided to depart from the presumption that the unsuccessful party bears the costs of the arbitration
Borderlex | 24-Jan-2017
In reality, the EU’s plans are not realistic in the current international context, nor will they appease ISDS critics
LesEco | 24-Jan-2017
«Amer Group», qui devait aménager la Cité de loisirs de Tamaouanza, compte saisir le Centre international de règlement des différends sur l’investissement (CIRDI) au cas où le Maroc ne parviendrait pas à trouver une solution à l’amiable.
Web Manager Center | 24-Jan-2017
Enterrée il y a quatre ans à l’initiative de la partie tunisienne, la recherche d’une solution amiable au litige va-t-elle être remise sur le tapis?
The Hindu | 24-Jan-2017
India, along with Brazil, Argentina and some other nations, has rejected an informal attempt by the European Union and Canada to work towards a global investment agreement that would incorporate a contentious ISDS mechanism.
EFILA | 24-Jan-2017
Joining the ICSID will enhance international perceptions of Iran as a welcoming country to invest.