investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Reuters | 15-Dec-2016
A World Bank tribunal ordered Venezuela to pay steelmaker Tenaris SA $162 million for expropriating two investments in the country
Bloomberg | 15-Dec-2016
The European Union and Canada will launch a proposal for a new global investment court system for settlements of disputes between states and foreign investors over discriminatory treatment.
El Boletín | 14-Dec-2016
Ambas instituciones quieren convertir esos tribunales en un verdadero órgano internacional.
Live Mint | 14-Dec-2016
If we can manage our own economies well, new trade pacts will become largely redundant.
El Mundo | 12-Dec-2016
La Mesa Nacional frente a la Minería Metálica en El Salvador exigió hoy a la minera Pacific Rim acatar el fallo del Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (Ciadi) y pagar al país centroamericano la indemnización impuesta de 8 millones de dólares.
Investing News Network | 12-Dec-2016
The claim relates to Eco Oro’s dispute with Colombia in relation to State measures that have destroyed the value of its investments in the Colombian mining sector.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 9-Dec-2016
Are we moving towards a double-barreled test for protected “investor”?
See News | 9-Dec-2016
Oleg Deripaska has, in his personal capacity, served a notice of arbitration against Montenegro, claiming unlawful expropriation of his investment and related treaty breaches
Prague Daily Monitor | 8-Dec-2016
Aircraftleasing Meier & Fischer has initiated international arbitration proceedings, asking compensation in the amount of USD 125.17m.
DW | 8-Dec-2016
Germany’s highest court has ruled in favor of three power companies in a dispute over a government decision to phase out nuclear energy. Vattenfall is also suing at the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).