investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

The Jordan Times | 4-Nov-2016
The Telecommunications Regulatory Commission (TRC) signed a settlement agreement with Orange Jordan, ending a dispute related to the renewal of the company’s second-generation (2G) network.
Alter Infos | 4-Nov-2016
Au terme de sept ans d’un processus d’arbitrage lancé par Oceana Gold le différend a été tranché en faveur de l’État salvadorien.
Bordelex | 3-Nov-2016
Once a desirable form of European international relations endorsed by the Commission, Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) became a problematic issue after the accession of former socialist countries in Central and Eastern Europe to the European Union, and with the emergence of the first intra-EU investment arbitration – ISDS – cases.
White & Case | 3-Nov-2016
Global law firm has won an arbitration award for Indian investor Flemingo DutyFree in a case brought against Poland under the India-Poland Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT)
Le Monde | 1-Nov-2016
Les tribunaux d’arbitrage associés au traité CETA (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) sont devenus ces dernières années le symbole des mouvements de contestation du libre-échange.
Espace Manager | 1-Nov-2016
Le groupe pétrolier suédois, Lundin, a fait condamner la Tunisie à lui verser 20 millions d’euros de dédommagement devant le tribunal arbitral Cirdi, mais ne parvient pas à en obtenir le règlement.
European Law Blog | 31-Oct-2016
The Belgian federal government will seek the opinion of the European Court of Justice on the compatibility of the Investment Court System (ICS) in CETA with the Treaties.
Les Echos | 31-Oct-2016
Un bras de fer oppose depuis plus de dix ans la cité égyptienne et Veolia, chargé d’assurer la collecte et le traitement de ses déchets. L’épilogue de ce feuilleton kafkaïen est proche.
Tercera Información | 28-Oct-2016
La campaña No al TTIP, de la que forma parte Ecologistas en Acción, convoca nuevas movilizaciones los días 4 y 5 noviembre para impedir la firma del acuerdo comercial UE-Canadá (CETA).
Inequality | 28-Oct-2016
In a tale of people power over corporate power, a tribunal has ruled against a global company in a case over mining rights. Now we need to block trade deals that allow these “investor-state” lawsuits.