Latin America

Latin American and Caribbean countries have signed almost 700 investment agreements. They have been targeted in almost 300 investor-state disputes.

Argentina has faced almost 62 ISDS cases, about 6% of all cases, making it the world’s most targeted state. Venezuela and Mexico have been among the ten most frequent respondents in the world, with 51 and 33 cases, respectively.

Many key cases such as Renco vs. Peru, Chevron vs. Ecuador or Pac Rim vs. El Salvador have originated in significant environmental damages caused by corporations. Philip Morris took an ISDS case against Uruguay over its anti-tobacco law.

Chile, Mexico and Peru are also party to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) with eight other Pacific Rim states. The TPP includes an investor-state dispute mechanism that undermines public-interest ‘safeguards’.

The most well-known cases ISDS cases in the region include:

Chevron (US) vs. Ecuador: For 26 years, Texaco, later acquired by Chevron, performed oil operations in Ecuador. Ecuadorian courts found that during that period the company dumped billions of gallons of toxic water and dug hundreds of open-air oil sludge pits in Ecuador’s Amazon, poisoning the communities of some 30,000 Amazon residents. After a legal battle spanning two decades, in November 2013, Ecuador’s highest court ordered the corporation to pay $9.5 billion to provide desperately needed clean-up and health care to afflicted indigenous communities. Chevron challenged the decisions produced by Ecuador’s domestic legal system before an ISDS tribunal. In 2018, the arbitration tribunal held that the $9.5 billion judgment was fraudulent, violated international public policy and should not be recognised or enforced by the courts of other States. The amount of the award has not been established yet. (Ecuador-United States BIT invoked)

Occidental Petroleum Corporation “Oxy” (US) vs. Ecuador: in 2012 Ecuador was ordered to pay US$1.77 billion to the investor, an oil exploration and production company, for breach of contract. Sentence was reduced to US$1 billion in November 2015 (Ecuador-United States BIT invoked).

Investors vs. Argentina: When Argentina froze its utility rates in response to its 2001-2002 financial crisis, it was hit by over 40 lawsuits from investors, including Suez & Vivendi (France), Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A (Spain) and Anglian Water (UK). The ISDS tribunal concluded that Argentina had breached the investors’ right to fair and equitable treatment. By 2014, the country had been ordered to pay a total of US$980 million (various BITs invoked).

Photo: Sairen42 / CC BY-SA 3.0

(April 2020)

Taylor & Francis Online | 20-Oct-2022
Why do governments include ISDS in investment treaties despite scant evidence of its economic benefits and clearer info about its costs?
CIAR Global | 19-Oct-2022
El tribunal del arbitraje de inversiones entre la constructora puertorriqueña Omega Engineering y Panamá ha desestimado la demanda de 100 millones de dólares contra el país centroamericano, iniciada en 2016, en relación con ocho contratos para la construcción de tres hospitales médicos, un centro de educación superior, un ayuntamiento, un juzgado y otras instalaciones.
Acción Ecológica | 17-Oct-2022
El gobierno ecuatoriano anunció que firmará un Tratado del Libre Comercio con China en el marco de la XV cumbre empresarial China-Latinoamérica y el Caribe, que se realizará en Guayaquil entre el 30 de noviembre y el 2 de diciembre próximos, con la presencia del presidente Xi Jinpin.
GRAIN | 17-Oct-2022
Hemos producido un relato/estudio detallado del TLCAN y su eterna ola de tratados y acuerdos, sus efectos y las herramientas que nos permitan analizar y resistir los impactos de los TLC.
GRAIN | 17-Oct-2022
We have produced a detailed study/story of NAFTA, with its eternal wake of treatises and agreements, its effects, and the tools to analyse and organise resistance against the impacts of FTAs.
Radio Uchile | 6-Oct-2022
En una carta enviada al Mandatario, la coordinadora afirmó que el TPP-11 permitirá a las corporaciones recurrir a los tribunales internacionales y exigir millonarias compensaciones si el país decide terminar con el sistema de AFP’s.
América Latina Mejor Sin TLC | 5-Oct-2022
“Los impactos que tendrá el TPP-11 deben ser analizados de modo integral, no por capítulos”, afirma Luciana Ghiotto y explica que “no hay modo que el tratado colabore en la construcción de un modelo de desarrollo diferente para Chile”.
América Latina Mejor Sin TLC | 4-Oct-2022
The impacts that TPP-11 will have then must be analyzed in an integral way, not by chapters. For years now, from various academic and social sectors, we have been explaining that agreements such as the TPP-11 are negative in their entirety.
CIAR Global | 3-Oct-2022
Los accionistas de la Sociedad Boliviana de Cemento SOBOCE presentaron contra el Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, un procedimiento arbitral ante la Corte Permanente de Arbitraje, el 11 de enero de 2020 por la expropiación de sus acciones en la Fábrica Nacional de Cemento (Fancesa).
Pressenza | 3-Oct-2022
The recent experience of the countries that have already ratified the TPP-11 and begun to operate, has demonstrated the character of this treaty and its pro-business tribunals, which is nothing more than an insurance for large corporations on their profits and markets.