investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

CEO | 10-Jul-2017
Le rapport énonce l’histoire d’une région roumaine et de son combat contre l’exploitation d’une mine aux conséquences potentiellement désastreuses.
Economic & Political Weekly | 10-Jul-2017
The Government of India and the Government of Andhra Pradesh are facing an arbitration suit due to the cancellation of bauxite mining approvals in Visakhapatnam. This is the latest in a series of legal actions by foreign investors in the country.
International Economic Law and Policy Blog | 10-Jul-2017
The EU and Japan seemed to have scrapped the classic BIT/investor protection architecture as a model.
BBC | 10-Jul-2017
Tobacco giant Philip Morris has been ordered to pay the Australian government millions of dollars after unsuccessfully suing the nation over its world-first plain-packaging laws.
NDTV India | 8-Jul-2017
What can India do at the level of trade and diplomacy to deal with RCEP
El Tiempo | 7-Jul-2017
Gobierno se defiende diciendo que “España no fue notificada antes de la sentencia”, como pide la ley.
Relaciones Internacionales | 5-Jul-2017
El artículo estudia las cláusulas del Acuerdo de Cooperación y Facilitación de las Inversiones (ACFI) entre Brasil y México en 2015. Se compara con las cláusulas estándar de los Tratados Bilaterales de Inversión (TBI) firmados en los años noventa.
DW | 5-Jul-2017
The Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague has said it has jurisdiction to hear the case of a Ukrainian company seeking to recover damages for property lost when Russia annexed Crimea.
The New Times | 5-Jul-2017
If Rwanda clings to BIT approach, its scope should be limited. Alternatively, it can embark on a more attractive investment climate in lieu of BITs.
Reuters | 5-Jul-2017
Acacia Mining said it was seeking an adjudicator to resolve its dispute with the Tanzanian government, a day after the east-African country passed two laws to force companies to re-negotiate their contracts.