investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Buzzfeed | 31-Jan-2017
Experts say that to agree trade deals outside the EU, the UK will have to sign up to an “unaccountable” legal system that can force states to overturn laws corporations don’t like.
Lexology | 31-Jan-2017
Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela
Derecho Internacional Público - Costa Rica | 31-Jan-2017
CIADI anuncia que desestima demanda por 261 millones de Euros contra Costa Rica
Columbia FDI Perspectives | 30-Jan-2017
Brazil has finally become a player in the international investment regime, but it represents a peculiar case in foreign investment relations.
JD Supra | 28-Jan-2017
The Protection of Investment Act 22 of 2015 (the Investment Act) aims to ultimately replace South Africa’s BITs.
Ch-aviation | 28-Jan-2017
Air Canada registered a case with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes to recover USD35 million in blocked funds.
Yahoo | 26-Jan-2017
The Tribunal has unanimously rejected the Respondent’s preliminary jurisdictional objections and opened the way for adjudication of the merits.
Observer | 26-Jan-2017
The TransCanada lawsuit became virtually meaningless as Trump signed an executive order to continue construction of the Keystone XL
Prensa Latina | 26-Jan-2017
Fallo favorable en el caso interpuesto por la empresa española Supervisión y Control S.A.
Sputnik | 26-Jan-2017
The Hague Court of Appeal has rejected a plea to bifurcate hearings on a complaint by the former shareholders of Russia’s now-defunct Yukos oil firm