investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

SSRN | 2-Mar-2017
This paper offers the first detailed English-language analysis of international investment arbitration law and practice in Thailand.
The Australian | 2-Mar-2017
Taxpayers are still in the dark about how much of their money has been spent on fighting tobacco giant Philip Morris over plain packaging laws.
La Presse | 1-Mar-2017
TransCanada a suspendu une poursuite de 15 milliards $ contre les États-Unis relativement à Keystone XL à la suite de signaux lancés par le président américain Donald Trump qui laissent peu de doute quant à l’approbation du projet d’oléoduc.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 1-Mar-2017
One question arising in the case of Poland terminating its BITs is what implications this has on the rights of foreign investors.
Reuters | 28-Feb-2017
TransCanada Corp has suspended a $15 billion NAFTA suit filed against the United States over the Keystone XL pipeline after U.S. President approved the project.
The Hindu | 28-Feb-2017
Even as bilateral investment treaties are strengthened, domestic legislation must be implemented.
The Tyee | 28-Feb-2017
FIPA means province could be blocked from improving care standards for residents.
The Hindu | 28-Feb-2017
But Ottawa’s stance on model investment treaty has New Delhi worried
L’Humanité | 27-Feb-2017
Le traité commercial entre l’Union européenne et le Canada prévoit que les litiges entre investisseurs étrangers et États soient jugés par une Cour spéciale. C’est dangereux pour nos lois, nos droits et notre Constitution. Explications et entretiens.
Sunday Guardian Live | 27-Feb-2017
There is no principled basis for EU’s demand of extending patent protection beyond the period of 20 years.