Latin America

Latin American and Caribbean countries have signed almost 700 investment agreements. They have been targeted in almost 300 investor-state disputes.

Argentina has faced almost 62 ISDS cases, about 6% of all cases, making it the world’s most targeted state. Venezuela and Mexico have been among the ten most frequent respondents in the world, with 51 and 33 cases, respectively.

Many key cases such as Renco vs. Peru, Chevron vs. Ecuador or Pac Rim vs. El Salvador have originated in significant environmental damages caused by corporations. Philip Morris took an ISDS case against Uruguay over its anti-tobacco law.

Chile, Mexico and Peru are also party to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) with eight other Pacific Rim states. The TPP includes an investor-state dispute mechanism that undermines public-interest ‘safeguards’.

The most well-known cases ISDS cases in the region include:

Chevron (US) vs. Ecuador: For 26 years, Texaco, later acquired by Chevron, performed oil operations in Ecuador. Ecuadorian courts found that during that period the company dumped billions of gallons of toxic water and dug hundreds of open-air oil sludge pits in Ecuador’s Amazon, poisoning the communities of some 30,000 Amazon residents. After a legal battle spanning two decades, in November 2013, Ecuador’s highest court ordered the corporation to pay $9.5 billion to provide desperately needed clean-up and health care to afflicted indigenous communities. Chevron challenged the decisions produced by Ecuador’s domestic legal system before an ISDS tribunal. In 2018, the arbitration tribunal held that the $9.5 billion judgment was fraudulent, violated international public policy and should not be recognised or enforced by the courts of other States. The amount of the award has not been established yet. (Ecuador-United States BIT invoked)

Occidental Petroleum Corporation “Oxy” (US) vs. Ecuador: in 2012 Ecuador was ordered to pay US$1.77 billion to the investor, an oil exploration and production company, for breach of contract. Sentence was reduced to US$1 billion in November 2015 (Ecuador-United States BIT invoked).

Investors vs. Argentina: When Argentina froze its utility rates in response to its 2001-2002 financial crisis, it was hit by over 40 lawsuits from investors, including Suez & Vivendi (France), Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A (Spain) and Anglian Water (UK). The ISDS tribunal concluded that Argentina had breached the investors’ right to fair and equitable treatment. By 2014, the country had been ordered to pay a total of US$980 million (various BITs invoked).

Photo: Sairen42 / CC BY-SA 3.0

(April 2020)

bilaterals.org | 26-Sep-2024
El reciente informe “Inversiones Mafiosas contra Honduras” aborda la preocupante situación que enfrenta el país centroamericano frente a las demandas interpuestas por empresas transnacionales en tribunales de arbitraje internacional.
CIAR Global | 23-Sep-2024
“Debido a las serias deficiencias de la resolución, y considerando las críticas expuestas por el árbitro disidente, la Secretaría de Economía iniciará un juicio de anulación del laudo ante las cortes competentes. Asimismo, el Gobierno de México hará valer todos los medios de defensa posibles.”
CIAR Global | 18-Sep-2024
La compañía estadounidense Odyssey Marine Exploration ha informado del laudo en el arbitraje de inversiones iniciado en 2019 contra México en el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (CIADI).
Business Wire | 18-Sep-2024
The award orders Mexico to pay US$37.1 million for breaching its obligations under NAFTA, plus interest.
Inside Climate News | 17-Sep-2024
One of Latin America’s poorest countries faces a wave of claims from foreign investors seeking billions of dollars. Chief among them is an American company looking to build a semi-autonomous “startup city.”
ISDS América Latina - TNI | 14-Sep-2024
En 2023 y 2024 Honduras ha recibido el total de diecinueve demandas en el arbitraje internacional por parte de inversionistas extranjeros y nacionales. Solamente entre 2023 y 2024 (hasta agosto) recibió catorce demandas en el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias sobre Inversiones (CIADI), del Banco Mundial.
La Jornada | 11-Sep-2024
Hay que tomar muy en serio las amenazas de la Cámara Internacional de Comercio de más demandas en contra de México en tribunales internacionales ante la reforma judicial aprobada por la Cámara de Diputados la semana pasada, y actualmente en discusión en el Senado
ISDS América Latina | 9-Sep-2024
En 2023 México fue el país que más demandas de arbitraje de inversión recibió en el marco de tratados de protección de inversiones a nivel mundial.
TNI | 9-Sep-2024
This report looks at Mexico’s investment protection regime and outlines its main consequences for the country.
CIAR Global | 30-Aug-2024
La compañía de Países Bajos Smurfit Westrock ha anunciado el laudo del Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (CIADI) en su litigio con Venezuela.