investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Mongabay | 13-Sep-2016
International trade agreement provisions once meant to protect investors today can challenge a nation’s sovereignty and invalidate environmental laws.
Common Dreams | 12-Sep-2016
TPP would double number of corporations empowered to demand U.S. taxpayer compensation.
Argentina Mejor sin TLC | 12-Sep-2016
Las organizaciones que formamos parte de la Asamblea Argentina mejor sin TLC repudiamos la realización del “Foro de Inversión y Negocios de la Argentina” (o “foro mini-Davos”) convocado por el gobierno argentino con el fin de negociar la llegada de inversiones extranjeras.
El Diario | 12-Sep-2016
Los gobiernos y los lobistas de las grandes corporaciones buscan nuevas formas de blindar la privatización y esquivar el proceso democrático.
Jeune Afrique | 12-Sep-2016
Selon des sources financières, le FMI a demandé à l’État tunisien de préparer une provision de 400 millions de dinars au titre d’une première tranche d’indemnités que celui-ci pourrait être amené à verser à ABCI Investments.
AITEC | 10-Sep-2016
Alors que la France tente de sauver le CETA en torpillant momentanément le TAFTA/TTIP, 17 organisations européennes rappellent les dangers de l’arbitrage d’investissement tel qu’il est proposé dans les deux traités.
BuzzFeed | 9-Sep-2016
A secretive global legal system gives corporations leverage over the countries where they operate. Everyone said the United States didn’t have anything to worry about, because American laws are fair to begin with. Everyone was wrong.
Spicy IP | 9-Sep-2016
The latest round of RCEP talks paints a worrisome picture for the global south, given that it will bring 3.5 billion people and 12% of world trade into its fold.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 9-Sep-2016
The Ukrainian “saga” on the enforcement of the SCC emergency arbitrator’s award continues – the case is pending the second round of cassation review.
Radio del Mar | 8-Sep-2016
La exposición de Lucía Sepúlveda enfatizó en peligros para la agricultura y la soberanía nacional, señalando que el TPP obliga a Chile a ratificar el Convenio UPOV 91 de privatización de la semilla, fortalece a empresas transnacionales como Monsanto, y establece tribunales internacionales para que los inversores demanden a los Estados.