Pacific

Pacific states have signed about 65 trade and investment agreements, 40 of which have been concluded by Australia alone.

Most of Australia’s trade deals specify investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions, including those with China (ChAFTA, in the final stage of being ratified), India, Korea, Mexico or Turkey.

Following a dispute with Philip Morris over an anti-tobacco law, Australia claimed it would refrain from engaging into new investment agreements with ISDS.

However Australia has signed ChAFTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) whose investment chapter has revealed the inclusion of an ISDS mechanism that would undermine public health, the environment and other public-interest ‘safeguards’.

The Philip Morris vs. Australia case is the most well-known dispute to date. When Australia voted an anti-tobacco law forcing tobacco companies to use plain packaging, US company Philip Morris initiated an ISDS dispute through its Hong Kong-based subsidiary. It invoked the Australia-Hong Kong bilateral investment treaty (BIT) due to the non-inclusion of ISDS provisions in the Australia-US BIT. The case has been eventually dismissed on procedural grounds. More than US$35 million of taxpayer money was reported to have gone up in smoke in legal fees only.

The Pacific has been the least targeted region. Only Australian investors have initiated disputes on two registered occasions.

(January 2016)

Yellowhead Institute | 26-Feb-2019
Exception clauses amount to little more than tokenism, and short-change our full rights to determine trade relationships on our land and oceanic territories.
Daily Blog | 21-Feb-2019
The panel on a sustainable world at the hui in October 2018 on What an Alternative and Progressive Trade Strategy for New Zealand argued for major changes to address pressing environmental issues.
Express Tribune | 29-Jan-2019
Pakistan is making a last-ditch effort for an out-of-court settlement in the Reko Diq mining case, wherein the complainant company whose contract was terminated is claiming $11.43 billion in damages in an international tribunal.
Asia Times | 23-Jan-2019
Pakistan may have to pay a damages claim worth $11 billion after losing the infamous Reko Diq case to an Australian mining company.
The Guardian | 17-Dec-2018
Global corporations should not have special legal rights to undermine the policies of democratically elected governments.
Australian Financial Review | 2-Nov-2018
Businesses in the mining sector and beyond insist protection for Australian investors in Indonesia is required in a free trade deal.
Sydney Morning Heralds | 26-Oct-2018
The UN Conference on Trade and Development new research shows that increased market power of global corporations is driving global income inequality. It recommends a review of existing regulation and trade agreements to develop “measures to curb abusive business practices.”
Financial Review | 12-Oct-2018
Crossbenchers are ramping up pressure on Labor at the 11th hour to reject the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade agreement, drafting amendments that would force opposition senators to vote against the party’s policy.
Voxy | 14-Aug-2018
A range of labour, health and environmental organisations are calling for a clause to be inserted into the CPTPP Amendment Bill that would prevent future governments from extending investor-state dispute settlement to countries seeking to join the agreement.
The Guardian | 8-Aug-2018
US energy company is seeking $350m in compensation in so-called ISDS case over gas turbines in Pilbara.

0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | ... | 160