Pacific

Pacific states have signed about 65 trade and investment agreements, 40 of which have been concluded by Australia alone.

Most of Australia’s trade deals specify investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions, including those with China (ChAFTA, in the final stage of being ratified), India, Korea, Mexico or Turkey.

Following a dispute with Philip Morris over an anti-tobacco law, Australia claimed it would refrain from engaging into new investment agreements with ISDS.

However Australia has signed ChAFTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) whose investment chapter has revealed the inclusion of an ISDS mechanism that would undermine public health, the environment and other public-interest ‘safeguards’.

The Philip Morris vs. Australia case is the most well-known dispute to date. When Australia voted an anti-tobacco law forcing tobacco companies to use plain packaging, US company Philip Morris initiated an ISDS dispute through its Hong Kong-based subsidiary. It invoked the Australia-Hong Kong bilateral investment treaty (BIT) due to the non-inclusion of ISDS provisions in the Australia-US BIT. The case has been eventually dismissed on procedural grounds. More than US$35 million of taxpayer money was reported to have gone up in smoke in legal fees only.

The Pacific has been the least targeted region. Only Australian investors have initiated disputes on two registered occasions.

(January 2016)

Scoop Politics | 6-Nov-2019
The CTU is concerned that the "upgrade" of the New Zealand-China Free Trade Agreement has not removed the threat of investor suits against the New Zealand government.
Sydney Criminal Lawyers | 30-Oct-2019
Interview with AFTINET convenor Dr Patricia Ranald about how the ISDS regime developed, the reasons why these mechanisms are so detrimental, and the impact the TPP-11 agreement could have on Australia.
AFTINET | 21-Oct-2019
Organisations representing millions of Australians wrote to Labor MPs last week asking them to implement their policies against harmful proposals including special rights for foreign investors to sue governments for millions over domestic laws.
Corrs Chambers Westgarth | 14-Aug-2019
The New York Convention is regarded as the most influential treaty in the area of international trade and international commercial arbitration.
Scoop Politics | 31-Jul-2019
There is a high risk that New Zealand would still allow the investor to sue New Zealand in this expensive and discredited system of international investment arbitration
The Age | 22-Jul-2019
Australian company planned was to mine tantulum, but seventeen years later, the company is suing the Egyptian government for potentially hundreds of millions of dollars after the military regime blocked plans.
Bangkok Post | 12-Jun-2019
Australian gold mining firm Kingsgate Consolidated is seeking negotiations with the new Thai government over the case in which it was ordered to cease mining operations in Phichit two years ago.
AFTINET | 12-Jun-2019
A new study of trade and investment deals concluded in 2018 by UNCTAD shows that most have either omitted ISDS altogether or severely limited its scope, reports AFTINET
Reuters | 14-May-2019
Poland’s prime minister and other government officials will meet to discuss a threat by Australia’s Prairie Mining to sue Warsaw over difficulties it faced in developing coal projects
UNSW | 7-May-2019
A former investment treaty between India and Australia allows for a legal claim if the mine doesn’t go ahead, but this shouldn’t deter a federal government, says a UNSW Law researcher.

0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | ... | 170