Energy & environment

Most investor-state disputes (ISDS) have concerned environmental matters. Corporations are using the ISDS system found in trade and investment agreements to challenge environmental policies. As of end of 2019, 41% of all ICSID cases were energy and natural resources-related.

Most well-known cases include:

• Lone Pine Resources (US) vs. Canada: the investor challenged Quebec’s moratorium on the controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, for natural gas. The provincial government declared the moratorium in 2011 so as to conduct an environmental impact assessment of the extraction method widely accused of leaching chemicals and gases into groundwater and the air. Case pending (NAFTA invoked).

• Bilcon (US) vs. Canada: the US industry challenged Canadian environmental requirements affecting their plans to open a basalt quarry and a marine terminal in Nova Scotia. In 2015 the ISDS tribunal decided that the government’s decision hindered the investors’ expectations. Bilcon won and received US$7 million in damages, plus interest (NAFTA invoked).

• Vattenfall (Sweden) vs. Germany: in 2007 the Swedish energy corporation was granted a provisional permit to build a coal-fired power plant near the city of Hamburg. In an effort to protect the Elbe river from the waste waters dumped from the plant, environmental restrictions were added before the final approval of its construction. The investor initiated a dispute, arguing it would make the project unviable. The case was ultimately settled in 2011, with the city of Hamburg agreeing to the lowering of environmental standards (ECT invoked).

Photo: Kris Krug / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

(March 2020)

The Edge Malaysia | 9-Jul-2025
Malaysian CSOs have urged the government to reject the inclusion of the ISDS clause in the RCEP agreement. They warn that ISDS allows foreign investors to sue governments over policies safeguarding public interests like health, workers, and the environment, potentially leading to costly legal battles and large payouts detrimental to national budgets.
La Jornada | 8-Jul-2025
En el documental Pero sí existimos, la lideresa ambiental del Mayab, Araceli Domínguez, señala que la minera estadunidense Vulcan miente diciendo que no hay una comunidad en resistencia al proyecto CALICA.
El Economista | 7-Jul-2025
El grupo, representado por el bufete Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, solicita el pago de hasta 90 millones de euros en disputas sometidas ante el CIADI con resultado favorable.
Infobae | 6-Jul-2025
En noviembre de 2020, Lupaka presentó una demanda contra el Estado peruano, acusando al Gobierno de respaldar a la comunidad de Parán y violar el Acuerdo de Libre Comercio entre Canadá y Perú.
Mining Weekly | 3-Jul-2025
The dispute arose under the Free Trade Agreement between Canada and Peru and concerned Lupaka’s investment in the Invicta gold project, located in the Andean highlands of Peru.
SOMO | 2-Jul-2025
How Shell and ExxonMobil use arbitration to offload the costs of closing the Netherlands’ largest gas field.
Le 360 | 2-Jul-2025
Le Comité ad hoc du Cirdi a décidé de prolonger le sursis à exécution de la sentence arbitrale condamnant le Maroc à verser une amende de 150 millions de dollars au profit du groupe suédois Corral Petroleum, actionnaire majoritaire de la Samir.
La Razon | 30-Jun-2025
El Centro Internacional para el Arreglo de Diferencias sobre Inversiones (Ciadi) da la razón al Estado frente a la reclamación de la alemana Portigon, bajo el Tratado de la Carta de la Energía
Resource World | 20-Jun-2025
Following an engagement with the government of Panama’s legal counsel, Franco Nevada said it has agreed to suspend its arbitration proceeding.
Infobae | 19-Jun-2025
El presidente Mulino confía en abrir diálogos con First Quantum Minerals tras la cancelación de arbitraje millonario por parte de Franco Nevada, abordando decisiones relacionadas con la mina Cobre Panamá.