Utility corporations have used investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions found in trade and investment agreements to challenge state attempts to regulate privatized public services such as water, social security or other services.

In response to several governments which have tried to lower public services rates for poorer populations or in face of a significant economic crisis, foreign companies have initiated ISDS disputes, claiming they were treated “unfairly”, due to their loss of profits.

Potentially, any significant reforms of standards in relation to major infrastructure or utilities and associated services could be the target of ISDS.

As of end of 2019, about 2/3 of all ISDS disputes concerned the services sector at large, including public services but also financial services, telecommunications, transport, construction, etc.

Most well-known disputes include:

• Azurix (US) v. Argentina: US$165 million awarded in 2006 to the investor, a water company. The dispute arose from the contamination of a reservoir, which made the water undrinkable in the area. The firm claimed the government had expropriated its investment and denied the firm “fair and equitable treatment” by not allowing rate increases and not investing sufficient public funds in the water infrastructure (Argentina-US BIT invoked).

• Tampa Electric Company “TECO” (US) vs. Guatemala: the US-based energy company challenged Guatemala’s decision to lower the electricity rates that a private utility could charge. TECO was awarded US$25 million in 2013 (CAFTA invoked).

• TCW (US) vs. Dominican Republic: the US investment management corporation that jointly owned with the government one of the Dominican Republic’s three electricity distribution firms, sued the government for failing to raise electricity rates and to prevent electricity theft by poor residents. Case settled in 2009 for US$26.5 million paid to the investor (CAFTA invoked).

Photo: Aqua Mechanical / CC BY 2.0

(March 2020)

El Economista | 10-May-2021
El CIADI negó la razón a América Móvil en un pleito contra Colombia por una polémica reversión de espectro y radiobases que data de hace 25 años y que ya costó 521 millones de dólares a esa compañía.
Reuters | 10-May-2021
America Movil said the World Bank’s ICSID tribunal has ruled against the company in its dispute with Colombia and ordered it to pay $2.2 million to cover the costs of the case.
Le Soir | 30-Apr-2021
L’État belge pourrait être contraint d’indemniser la société de logistique DP World à hauteur de 150 millions d’euros, selon une décision de la juridiction d’arbitrage de la Banque mondiale.
CIAR Global | 17-Apr-2021
ISA alega la violación del capítulo de inversiones del Acuerdo de Libre Comercio suscrito por Chile y Colombia.
IPS | 8-Apr-2021
Private insurance corporations are suing Argentina and Bolivia for loss of potential profits as a result of the reversal of privatization of pension programs.
Le Monde Arabe | 6-Apr-2021
Pour Orange, l’Irak du début des années 2010 était un marché juteux et à fort potentiel de croissance, après l’intervention américaine avait laissé un pays en ruine.
Página 12 | 4-Apr-2021
El premio Nobel de Economía Joseph Stiglitz junto a otros 100 expertos internacionales criticaron las demandas de bancos e inversores privados contra la estatización de los sistemas previsionales en Argentina y Bolivia.
The American Prospect | 24-Mar-2021
An improbable victory in El Salvador offers lessons for grassroots activists worldwide.
Telefónica | 15-Mar-2021
La compañía reclama el cumplimiento del acuerdo de inversiones suscrito entre España y el país latinoamericano.
Broadband TV News | 11-Mar-2021
Netherlands-based United Group claims that Serbia has violated several obligations related to incentives and mutual protection of investments between the two countries.

0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | ... | 230