UNCITRAL
EJIL: Talk! | 18-Feb-2020
As observers of the UNCITRAL process, we watch the debates with great interest, writing about the emergence of different camps, giving perspectives on how the process fits within broader geopolitical developments, and offering potential models for moving forward.
| 31-Jan-2020
We civil society organizations and trade unions from the African continent express our concerns about the proposal presented by the European Union to establish a multilateral investment court and support further reaching reforms of ISDS.
IELP | 27-Jan-2020
The UNCITRAL Working Group III turned squarely to designing permanent institutions: a standing appellate mechanism and a multilateral investment court (MIC).
The Globalist | 27-Jan-2020
The US government used to be the chief proponent of strong investor protection clauses in international trade deals. No longer. What happened?
EJIL: Talk! | 24-Oct-2019
In the end, states have the power to decide collectively what reforms to pursue, in what order and in what form. Individually, they will also have choice about which particular reform options to adopt.
EJIL: Talk! | 24-Oct-2019
This process is likely to end with a plural solution in which both models (ISDS and a permanent court), and possibly others, exist.
IISD | 14-Oct-2019
Varios Estados participantes en el proceso de la CNUDMI ya han adoptado alternativas viables a la ISDS.
IISD | 14-Oct-2019
Plusieurs États prenant part au processus de la CNUDCI ont d’ores et déjà adopté des alternatives viables au RDIE.
IISD | 14-Oct-2019
Several states participating in the UNCITRAL process have already adopted viable alternatives to ISDS.
AFTINET | 1-Oct-2019
Their submissions conclude that the system is detrimental to public budgets, regulations in the public interest, democracy and the rule of law.

0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70