European Union (EU) member states have signed over 1300 investment treaties with third countries, in addition to some 200 between EU members. Non-EU European states are party to over 500 treaties. Most of these contain investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions, which enable foreign corporations to take ISDS claims against states if they deem their profits or potential investment to be affected by new laws or changes in policy.

The EU has ratified four agreements with an ISDS mechanism: the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), to which 53 European and Central Asian countries are party, the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada, and agreements with Vietnam and Singapore. Only the ECT has been fully in force. The ISDS provisions in the three others will be implemented after all member states have ratified them.

These three deals also include a revised ISDS mechanism created by the European Commission, known as the investment court system. Many critics say that this new system is largely window-dressing and does not address the core of the problem behind investor-state dispute measures.

In 2015, the European Commission asked the EU member states to terminate their intra-EU bilateral investment treaties (BITs), arguing they are incompatible with EU law, which was confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its “Achmea” decision.

As of April 2020, the number of intra-EU ISDS disputes amounted to 170, approximately 17% of all cases globally, 76 of which having been brought under the ECT.

Overall investors from European countries have initiated over 600 ISDS cases, half of which are against non-European states. European countries have been targeted in about 350 cases. Grouped together, investors from EU member states have launched the majority of total disputes (over 400).

Spain, the Czech Republic, Poland, Russia and Ukraine have been among the ten most frequent respondent states, while the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, France, Luxembourg, Italy and Switzerland have been among the ten most frequent home states of the investor.

The most well-known cases include:

Yukos (Isle of Man) vs. Russia: US$50 billion awarded in 2014 to majority shareholders of the oil and gas company (ECT invoked).

Eureko (Netherland) vs. Poland: case settled in 2005 for about €2 billion in favour of the investor, a large European insurance company (Netherland-Poland BIT invoked).

Ceskoslovenska Obchodni Banka (Czech Republic) vs. Slovak Republic: €553 million awarded in 2004 to the investor, one of the largest commercial banks in the Czech Republic (Czech Republic-Slovak Republic BIT invoked).

Photo: War on Want

(April 2020)

Open Democracy | 10-Mar-2023
We can’t be held hostage by a 1990s treaty that allows fossil fuel firms to sue governments.
Euractiv | 7-Mar-2023
Environmental organisations are threatening to bring about a court challenge to the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between the EU and Canada, just as the ratification of the agreement is set to be on the agenda.
Lexology | 3-Mar-2023
The advanced framework agreement’s investment protection provisions include many of the substantive obligations that are common in international investment agreement.
CIAR Global | 27-Feb-2023
El comité ad hoc del procedimiento de anulación del arbitraje Watkins Holdings y otros contra España, a través de los que el fondo británico Bridgepoint invirtió en plantas de renovables españolas, ha decidido rechazar la petición de la defensa de España para anular el laudo de 77 millones de euros.
RTBF | 21-Feb-2023
La Région bruxelloise, par la voix de son ministre de la transition climatique, Alain Maron, appelle la Belgique au retrait coordonné européen "le plus rapide possible de ce Traité anachronique de protection des investissements dans les énergies fossiles".
CIAR Global | 20-Feb-2023
La jueza Tania S Chutkan del Tribunal de la Corte de Distrito de Columbia (EE.UU.) ha ordenado a España que afronte el arbitraje de NextEra y desista de buscar eludir el laudo de más de 290 millones de euros que concedió un tribunal internacional en marzo de 2019.
Lexology | 17-Feb-2023
This article provides a concise summary of the enforcement framework for investment treaty awards under the two most important conventions governing this subject.
CNCD 11.11.11 | 15-Feb-2023
L’Union européenne et ses Etats membres vont se retirer du Traité sur la charte de l’énergie. La Commission européenne reconnaît aujourd’hui qu’une sortie coordonnée est inévitable.
The Guardian | 13-Feb-2023
Secret international court system enables fossil fuel firms to sue governments for lost future profits.
Euractiv | 13-Feb-2023
Bern said it will not join the European Union’s proposed mass exit from a controversial energy investment protection treaty, sparking fears that fossil fuel companies will use Switzerland as a rear base to keep suing governments over climate action.

0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | ... | 1880