investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

The Mazatlán Post | 28-Mar-2019
The US company notified its intention to claim compensation of 3,540 million dollars from the Mexican government.
Open Democracy | 28-Mar-2019
The infamous story of the environmental pollution of the Ecuadorian Amazon by Chevron-Texaco – which has come to be known as the "Ecuadorian Chernobyl" - is entering a new phase.
Contacto HOY | 27-Mar-2019
Un arbitraje internacional desestimó la demanda por 100 millones de dólares que la empresa de telecomunicaciones estadounidense Italba Corporation interpuso contra Uruguay en el 2016, informaron este lunes fuentes oficiales.
Rabble | 27-Mar-2019
While Eco Oro claims to have invested US$250 million in the project, it is seeking US$764 million as compensation for the cancellation of the project.
Marianne | 27-Mar-2019
Les nouvelles formes d’accords commerciaux ont tendance à régir le fonctionnement interne des États politiques en leur imposant des règles claires et des contraintes en sacralisant le pouvoir des investisseurs.
Sud Info | 27-Mar-2019
C’est le 30 avril prochain que la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne rendra son avis concernant la compatibilité avec le droit de l’UE du système d’arbitrage prévu dans l’accord commercial entre l’Union et le Canada (CETA).
The Conversation | 27-Mar-2019
Philip Morris, a US company, moved ownership of its Australian operations to Hong Kong to take advantage of ISDS in an Australia-Hong Kong investment treaty.
AFTINET | 27-Mar-2019
The Australia-Hong Kong Free Trade Agreement and separate Investment Agreement signed still give special rights to foreign investors to bypass national courts and sue governments for millions of dollars in international tribunals
MENAFN | 26-Mar-2019
British Petroceltic announced filing an arbitration case against the Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC) at the World Bank Group’s ICSID.
Les Yeux du Monde | 26-Mar-2019
Pensés au départ pour pallier le manque de stabilité des investissements dans des pays réputés instables, les mécanismes d’arbitrage international se sont peu à peu érigés en véritables vecteurs d’influence pour les entreprises.