investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Reuters | 29-Jan-2019
The EU-Canada free trade deal’s provisions on investor protection are in line with EU law, a senior court adviser said in a recommendation to the European Court of Justice.
L’Echo | 29-Jan-2019
Le traité commercial avec le Canada est compatible avec le droit de l’Union, estime l’avocat général de la Cour de Justice de l’UE.
Open Democracy | 24-Jan-2019
Campaigners dressed as wolves in suits invaded the streets of Davos to highlight the real face of private-sector influence.
La Vie Eco | 24-Jan-2019
La multinationale allemande estime que le gouvernement marocain a entravé son investissement dans une unité de recyclage des déchets ferreux, en fermant abusivement les frontières à ses exportations de ferraille E40 à partir de l’année 2013.
SSRN | 24-Jan-2019
International investment law overlooks the interests of local communities. This is especially troublesome in foreign investment in natural resources and infrastructure, where the local communities are the most affected and whose harm often leads to disputes.
No al TTIP | 23-Jan-2019
"Los acuerdos de comercio e inversión de hoy otorgan a las empresas transnacionales derechos especiales de gran alcance y el acceso a un sistema paralelo de justicia para hacerlos valer. Pedimos a la UE y a los Estados miembro poner fin a estos privilegios saliendo de los tratados de comercio e inversión existentes que contengan el ISDS"
Asia Times | 23-Jan-2019
Pakistan may have to pay a damages claim worth $11 billion after losing the infamous Reko Diq case to an Australian mining company.
Belarus Digest | 22-Jan-2019
In late 2017 and 2018, Belarus faced a record-breaking three investment arbitration claims.
TNI | 22-Jan-2019
Join the movement to end corporate privilege, sign the petition!
Politis | 22-Jan-2019
Cent cinquante ONG, syndicats et associations s’associent pour demander la fin des « tribunaux arbitraux » qui protègent les multinationales. Elles espèrent imposer le « devoir de vigilance » comme une nouvelle norme.