investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

South Centre | 29-Jun-2016
A growing international community of policy makers and analysts that recognizes that major reforms in the investment treaty regime are needed.
Kaos en la Red | 28-Jun-2016
El próximo 1 de Julio, el gobierno de Mauricio Macri participará como “país observador” de la Alianza del Pacífico.
Domain-b | 28-Jun-2016
The new model text on the basis of which India is negotiating its Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT) is making it difficult for America to hold bilateral talks on the proposed India-US BIT
The Jakarta Post | 28-Jun-2016
The Indonesian government is currently reviewing all its international investment treaties after previously having terminated 20 bilateral investment treaties (BIT).
La Prensa | 27-Jun-2016
El Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas (MEF) pagará 1.3 millones de dólares para que un bufete de Estados Unidos defienda este año a Panamá en el juicio internacional que llevan a cabo dos empresas por la hidroeléctrica Bajo de Mina en Chiriquí.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 27-Jun-2016
By virtue of the ICSID Convention awards are automatically enforceable. But enforcement of an award is only half of the equation; award holders must also navigate the separate, but equally important, task of executing the award.
Métro | 27-Jun-2016
La société TransCanada réclame au gouvernement américain plus de 15 milliards $ en dédommagement pour son refus d’autoriser le projet d’oléoduc Keystone XL.
Financial Post | 27-Jun-2016
TransCanada Corp. made good on its threat to challenge the rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline, filing a request for arbitration under NAFTA to recoup US$15 billion in damages from the U.S. government.
Sidney Morning Herald | 27-Jun-2016
Australian governments of late seem only to listen to the din of money as though that equates with national interest.
Alter Eco + | 27-Jun-2016
Jusqu’où peut-on pousser la logique du libre-échange ?