Services

Utility corporations have used investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions found in trade and investment agreements to challenge state attempts to regulate privatized public services such as water, social security or other services.

In response to several governments which have tried to lower public services rates for poorer populations or in face of a significant economic crisis, foreign companies have initiated ISDS disputes, claiming they were treated “unfairly”, due to their loss of profits.

Potentially, any significant reforms of standards in relation to major infrastructure or utilities and associated services could be the target of ISDS.

As of end of June 2015, 6% of all ICSID disputes concerned water services issues.

Most well-known disputes include:

• Azurix (US) v. Argentina: US$165 million awarded in 2006 to the investor, a water company. The dispute arose from the contamination of a reservoir, which made the water undrinkable in the area. The firm claimed the government had expropriated its investment and denied the firm “fair and equitable treatment” by not allowing rate increases and not investing sufficient public funds in the water infrastructure (Argentina-US BIT invoked).

• Tampa Electric Company “TECO” (US) vs. Guatemala: the US-based energy company challenged Guatemala’s decision to lower the electricity rates that a private utility could charge. TECO was awarded US$25 million in 2013 (CAFTA invoked).

• TCW (US) vs. Dominican Republic: the US investment management corporation that jointly owned with the government one of the Dominican Republic’s three electricity distribution firms, sued the government for failing to raise electricity rates and to prevent electricity theft by poor residents. Case settled in 2009 for US$26.5 million paid to the investor (CAFTA invoked).

(November 2015)

Al Wihda | 22-Feb-2020
Une société de services financiers, basée aux États-Unis, a saisi le CIRDI au sujet d’un différend avec le Cameroun lié à une série de plateformes numériques.
Ciar Global | 6-Feb-2020
La compañía portuguesa Mota Engil reclama un total de 25 millones de dólares al estado paraguayo por el fallido contrato del proyecto Metrobús.
Reuters | 4-Feb-2020
The ride-hailing firm said its initial calculations suggest damages from suspending its service in Colombia will exceed $250 million.
Ciar Global | 4-Feb-2020
En enero, Colombia recibió una notificación de intención de acudir a arbitraje de inversiones por parte de Uber y su filial colombiana por suspender el servicio en el país.
IAReporter | 13-Jan-2020
The US-based ridesharing services platform Uber Technologies and its Colombian subsidiary, Uber Colombia, have threatened to initiate arbitration proceedings against Colombia under the Colombia-US Trade Promotion Agreement.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 19-Nov-2019
Global investment governance needs to be redesigned for the 21st century, with people and the planet at the core.
Ciar Global | 29-Oct-2019
Terence Highlands reclama la expropiación ilegal de las inversiones de la empresa Coastline, de la que es dueño, y exige alrededor de 80 millones de dólares.
El Mañana | 28-Oct-2019
Las acciones del Gobierno de Enrique Peña Nieto contra Oceanografía podrían costarle alrededor de 300 millones de dólares a la actual Administración.
National Law Review | 24-Oct-2019
This case involves a dispute between TECO, an energy company incorporated in the United States, and the Republic of Guatemala, over electricity rates.
Ecoticias | 23-Oct-2019
Con motivo de la Semana de Acción contra la Impunidad Corporativa, la campaña Derechos para las Personas Obligaciones para las Multinacionales lanzó en toda Europa la web de Premios Escobilla de Oro.

0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | ... | 110